Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ohrid SOS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 17:00, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ohrid SOS

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG. 2passing mentions and an article written by members of the ONG and the ONG's web site are not enough to show notability. Article creator seems to be a COI editor Dom from Paris (talk) 15:18, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Macedonia-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 15:26, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 15:27, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 15:28, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 15:28, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OhridSponge (talk) 15:38, 4 July 2018 (UTC)OhridSponge[reply]

Article has been edited with more thorough explanation of activities and outcomes plus wider references to answer WP:NORG and WP:GNG issues in particular to answer notability.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 17:25, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. If the redlinked UNESCO Ohrid-Prespa Biosphere Reserve had an article and was notable (my first glance doesn't appear so), I would suggest redirecting there. Without that, I don't see anything that satisfies WP:NORG for standalone notability. Everything I see is mostly organizational WP:PUFFERY language of subject collaborated with group X,Y,Z or content about the geographic area instead. Not to mention that OhridSponge cannot be editing the article directly per WP:COI. Kingofaces43 (talk) 15:37, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.