- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Stifle (talk) 13:12, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oildex (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Appears to be advertising for the company; possible conflict of interest by the only author. nneonneotalk 19:11, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. spam. Queerbubbles | Leave me Some Love 19:23, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Save Oildex article as it has been condensed and rewritten to indicate information regarding Industry standards, securities, and assurances within the automated accounts payable sector. Please remove AfD tag in response. Courtney L Brewer 17:53, 16 April 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by CourtneyLBrewer (talk • contribs)
- Comment: AfD tags aren't generally removed until the debate closes. At this point, it looks like it will be in the article's favor anyway. nneonneo talk 23:15, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Is this an article for Oildex or for Transzap? Opening sentence seems to favor the latter, but the title indicate the former. Sources/citations do not seem to be independent, and the WP:COI problem has not been resolved. Delete without prejudice toward rewriting by an objective third party with no conflict of interest... and preferably with citations from sources not connected to Transzap or its owners. B.Wind (talk) 01:24, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.