Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Old B.O.B. (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to The Black Hole. History not retained as no useful sourced content to incorporate. Cirt (talk) 18:11, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Old B.O.B. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This character does not establish notability independent of its film. Without non-trivial coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 16:07, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The first AfD is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Old B.O.B.. – sgeureka t•c 21:19, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Pure plot for a one-time character. – sgeureka t•c 21:18, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a non-plausible search term. Fails to establish individual notability outside the main movie article. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 22:52, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge a little of it. Minor but not trivial role in the plot. More than background. DGG (talk) 23:29, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge or Redirect some of the article to The Black Hole where character has his notability. The simple answer. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 06:20, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- raven1977 (talk) 05:24, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- raven1977 (talk) 05:25, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Merging would depend on the content being cited, which it isn't, and redirecting isn't necessary as this isn't a useful search term. Stifle (talk) 17:39, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.