Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Old Forge-Taylor Football Rivalry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Wknight94 (talk) 15:32, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed for deletion, proposal expired without comments, deleted by me. Author contacted me for undeletion (twice, on account of my sloppiness), so I undeleted it. I am nominating it for deletion purely out of procedure. I have no arguments either for or against its deletion. JIP | Talk 20:48, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete- per nom and non-notable. AndreNatas (talk) 21:11, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This is the kind of chart I'd like to see floating around the internet somewhere if I really cared about it, but it's too local and minor to be justified on Wikipedia. There are tens or hundreds of Thanksgiving rivalries in American football. I prefer to reserve rivalry articles to major ones such as Red Sox-Yankees rivalry. (P. S. Go Sox!) :) Shalom (Hello • Peace) 03:38, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - There are many local rivalries listed on Wikipedia and for those from each respective area, pages like this are very interesting and informative. Articles regarding major sports rivalries like the Yankees-Red Sox can be found anywhere on the internet, but there are few places to read hard-to-find local sports trivia. Lou72JG (talk) 16:12, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as prodder, local rivalrys aren't notable without the proper sources to meet WP:N Secret ^account 21:07, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I'm sure some people really really care about this article, but I don't think they'll care so much as to want to know all the details listed here. I think if they really wanted to know they would check the Scranton Times Archives, which is likely to be more reliable than this article. M1ss1ontomars2k4 (talk) 23:10, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.