- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sango123 22:48, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable local organization. The article reads almost like the pub variation of WP:NFT —C.Fred (talk) 01:43, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as unverifiable. --Metropolitan90 04:59, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom and Metropolitan90 Pinkstarmaci 05:31, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It seems not to be well-known. There's no external link provided to that organization, which makes it unverifiable. --Wai Wai (talk) 05:45, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as unverifiable. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 06:14, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as unverifiable. --Draicone (talk) 06:23, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per the above. Seems like a joke page. Every town has it's "old men's clubs" --HResearcher 07:05, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator. JIP | Talk 07:48, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. And it can't be very popular if it's just a club for one old man. Tonywalton | Talk 10:57, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Generic term and vague. SynergeticMaggot 11:05, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Probably could have been speedied under Wikipedia:Notability (organizations). :) Dlohcierekim 21:27, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.