Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omega-class destroyer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of starships in Babylon 5. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:27, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Omega-class destroyer

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication this fictional starship class passes WP:GNG/WP:NFICTION. Pure WP:PLOT. BEFORE fails to show anything that is not a plot summary. Some discussion of origin and design, but mostly sourced to blogs/listervs/etc. Deprod by User:Sgeureka with "remove prod for being one of the better-written B5 articles (WP:WAF) - either take it to AfD, or I suggest merging his with the Ship list (along with Babylon 5 (fictional space station) and Starfury". So, let's discuss: delete, merge or keep? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:09, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:09, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:09, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into List of starships in Babylon 5. This kind of real-world design information is exactly what WP:WAF recommends for coveraging fictional items, and I believe that since it's so rare to find on WP amidst all the fancruft, we shouldn't delete it further. However, this fictional item doesn't need a stand-alone article. Since B5 aired in the early internet days, I can overlook that the creators used outdated ways of fan communication that WP typically doesn't recommend as sources, but that's part of the show's history (Babylon 5's use of the Internet). – sgeureka ^t•c 08:29, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails NFICTION/GNG. No shred of analysis. Not opposed to redirect. Kacper IV (talk) 12:46, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - All primary information, fails GNG. TTN (talk) 15:00, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.