Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OmniCode (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 03:45, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OmniCode

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

At the previous deletion discussion in 2006, the main argument for keeping seemed to be that the nominator's Google test was flawed. Which, perhaps, it was. However, the evidence presented in that discussion appears to have been limited to Google and the User Friendly site. Our notability guidelines require significant coverage in reliable, independent sources, and this article contains no such references. I also can't find any such references myself, although that may be due to confusion with other things named "OMNICODE" or some variant. As such, since this appears to have no notability outside of the User Friendly community, I don't think Wikipedia is the place for this content. Powers ^T 12:05, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I can find no reliable sources writing about this. -- Whpq (talk) 17:47, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete standards now are different from 2006 and this is unsourced silliness. Miami33139 (talk) 07:29, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.