- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 13:22, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Omnidrive (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The subject article appears to be a non-notable defunct software organization. The subject lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources and fails the notability guidelines for organizations. Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 20:13, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. IT firms arise like summer showers, and vanish just as quickly; the Circle of Life goes on. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:41, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails WP:CORP. Never had any lasting notability. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 15:14, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. The company wasn't / isn't notable per WP:GNG or WP:CORP. Colonel Tom 10:39, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.