Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omnify

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite 00:03, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Omnify

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotion for non-notable company, article by a company PR representative. I have been unable to find any significant third-party coverage in reliable sources. Haakon (talk) 15:49, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:48, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:49, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable, advertising. Unsupported. The only ref provided is a dead link. Google search turns up press releases but no independent coverage. --MelanieN (talk) 19:31, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:21, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Link to article that led to originally inclusion on PLM vendor listing was changed, therefore appeared broken. Has been fixed on product lifecycle management page to be http://www.mddionline.com/article/software-systems-breaking-boundaries-device-makers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.76.218.185 (talk) 18:29, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.