- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 15:11, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per neologism --דניאל - Dantheman531 02:29, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Was not aware that neologisms are disallowed. Sorry. --Blckleprd 02:33, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NEO. Only 514 Google results [1]--☆TBC☆ (aka Tree Biting Conspiracy) 02:34, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. Ted 02:36, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete neologism. Jammo (SM247) 05:43, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. I don't think it's even valid enough for wiktionary. Paddles TC 08:35, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete the new word that has not been verified. --Starionwolf 18:13, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. —Khoikhoi 20:08, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.