- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:49, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Omnis Network (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Dankim1180 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Web-hosting company. Fails WP:ORG. The only coverage it seems to have received are those in webhosting directory cites which count little for WP:N. They mainly list product plans rather than discuss the company. The company doesn't seem to have received, for example, substantial coverage from at least a moderate-sized newspaper. Contested prod (see User_talk:Christopher_Connor#Web_Hosting_Industry). Comparisons with other webhosting companies, but they at least have some coverage outside directory sites. Christopher Connor (talk) 02:04, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:32, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:32, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete None of the sources are both independent of the subject and offer significant coverage. Delete per WP:GNG. --Odie5533 (talk) 20:26, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, and I'd say speedy delete. This is a ___domain registrar and web hosting company - one of thousands - and even if they've been reviewed by CNet, I don't see this as establishing subminimal significance. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:50, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.