- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WjBscribe 23:45, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This page is about original research that is not cited by any reliable secondary source Anarchia 06:05, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The page was also created by the person whose ideas it describes. Anarchia 06:08, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A quick google search shows up no reliable hits for this article. It is also difficult to verify the contents of this article as well. --Siva1979Talk to me 06:16, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 10:32, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No sources and unverifiable. Concern about possible vanity article. Pursey 12:45, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as neologism with associated verifiability problems. Jakew 16:17, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete dangerously close to WP:SPAM. Burzmali 01:00, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.