Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/On Path to Liberation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No evidence of notability yet. This close is without prejudice to the article being re-created at a later time, if/when the subject becomes notable enough for inclusion. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 02:11, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On Path to Liberation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article about a low-budget film. Fails WP:NFILM. - Mr X 16:39, 30 November 2013 (UTC) This film is not low budget on the region it was filmed in. Further, Pedapati Venkata Ramana Murthy is a legendary acting coach of Visakapatnam who is acting in a film for the first time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:C:4580:2B5:E1AC:238:B71C:2386 (talk) 02:47, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:07, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:07, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Filmmaker:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete for now as being TOO SOON and lacking coverage under WP:NFF (paragraph 3) to merit being a possible exception to guideline. Film appears to be completed and in now in post production. IF it gets the requisite coverage after release, this can be un-deleted and fixed or recreated. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 08:55, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
While the director is refusing to be interviewed, this film production was very well covered in local media in Visakapatnam. Please wait until Dec 21 when a media presentation is promised for the next coverage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.186.109.70 (talk) 23:04, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now. Lack of coverage fails both WP:GNG and WP:NFF. If the IP editors want to recreate it later, when the actual film is released, that would be appropriate. As it is, the production has generated exactly one article in a reliable source, and even most of the cast on the imdb page is listed as "rumored". There is simply no way of telling at this time whether this film will be released next month or get stuck in development hell. Considering the closeness of the release date combined with the lack of coverage, there is certainly a non-zero chance of the latter. --Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 13:53, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.