- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. SushiGeek 02:36, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I am posting this article for deletion in accordance with WP:NMG Benji64 22:29, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. WP:NMG needs serious revision as it overly resticts new artists simply because they are not owned yet by the RIAA. --CelticWonder 06:32, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Be that as it may, WP:NMG is the way it is now, and that is the criteria i posted the article for deletion on. The criteria is not what the discussion is about. As well, it seems clear to me that this is a self-posted vanity article, put up for no other reason than to promote a hardly known band. Benji64 15:32, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. If we didn't have WP:NMG we'd have an entry for every wannabe who has a home-made MP3 available from his myspace page. Let new artists become genuinely well-known first, and then list them in Wikipedia. Fan1967 21:53, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, nn band. Stifle (talk) 22:26, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Moe ε 18:26, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.