Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One and the Same

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirected to album article. Any information can be inserted there. ELIMINATORJR 23:04, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One and the Same (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

it is not necessary to have pages for every song in the album. the songs are not important enough to have a page. most of the pages don't have that much info anyway. if there is any useful info on the song pages, they can be merged into the album article (revelations). i am also nominating the other songs in the album, except for the singles. ▓░ Dark Devil ░▓ ( Talk ♥ Contribs ) 09:28, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. —Drowne | Talk 12:08, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge per WP:MUSIC. >Radiant< 13:11, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect; wasn't even released as a single. Eleland 14:18, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge definitely. The song isn't enough to deserve its own article. That information can easily be put into its merge.Silver seren 15:24, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge It is not required to have separate pages for each song.Harlowraman 19:25, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect. It is tempting to say delete to discourage these type of articles, but I suppose a redirect is harmless enough. Burntsauce 20:48, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.