Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One dimensional nano materials

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 10:26, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One dimensional nano materials

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non encyclopedic essay WuhWuzDat 17:52, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Judging from the appearance of this article, it is almost certainly a copy-and-paste from somewhere. Perhaps from someone's school paper(?). •••Life of Riley (T–C) 04:24, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It does look like a copy/paste of a journal article. This article is (yet) absent on Web of Science and might be in print or alike, but it is not encyclopedical and not neutral. The author name coincides with the name in one of the references (thus potential COI). The references are very single sided (to China/Asia) whereas the field is huge. It is much easier to rewrite such an article from scratch than to modify the present content. Materialscientist (talk) 01:16, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 05:46, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - I think the topic might be notable, but Materialscientist is probably correct in that it is easier to start over. There is currently nothing in this article worth keeping. PDCook (talk) 15:53, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.