- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Chumbox. Liz Read! Talk! 23:18, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- One weird trick (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems to rely heavily on pulling together various articles on various people's ads that all use a similar format, but not necessarily proving that the phase "one weird trick" is notable. As an alternative we might be able to use the one weird trick of merging the article with chumbox, which is the ad format in which these usually appear. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 23:24, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Advertising, and Internet. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 23:24, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Merge Slate-sourced information into chumbox per nom. The Slate source is the only source that doesn't require synthesis to include into the article. Aaron Liu (talk) 02:19, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Merge with chumbox, other refs are tenuous links at best. Jtwhetten (talk) 21:43, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.