Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenBEXI

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:54, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OpenBEXI

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable software Dandv 07:36, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 May 31. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:01, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:10, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:10, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - software article of unclear notability, lacking multiple independent RS references. The one borderline-RS ref is internetspotter, which describes itself as a blog. In any case, on its own this ref is not sufficient to establish notability. A search turned up download sites and incidental mentions, but no further significant WP:RS coverage of this software. Article was created by an SPA with a name similar to the developer, so likely promotional.Dialectric (talk) 01:35, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:30, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:35, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Software developed by "arcazj"; article contributed by WP:SPA User:Arcazj. Of the given refs, only the 2008 review on Internetspotter could be considered and my searches are not finding anything better that could indicate the software to be notable. AllyD (talk) 06:41, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.