Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenBVE (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Ixfd64 (talk) 02:46, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OpenBVE (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Article was deleted less than a week ago and has now been recreated. The software is still not notable and has no reliable sources.ZoeL (talk) 15:54, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and WP:SALT per nom. JBsupreme (talk) 16:35, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per ZoeL's nomination. This article has not established notability, nor it has any reliable sources to cover the facts. I might also consider WP:SALT as well, since this article was deleted less than a week ago and no recreation is necessary. Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 16:45, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete As stated in nomination. ZoeL (talk) 16:56, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Fails WP:N. Iowateen (talk) 05:37, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Suggestion: Please also inspect the related article BVE Trainsim which has similar problems regarding reliable sources and prove of notability. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.247.240.234 (talk) 19:43, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as well as BVE Trainsim. Andre (talk) 03:16, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Question: The poor content of the article aside, could these sources be potentially used to establish notability from third-parties? [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] I am just asking because I want to understand what is an acceptable source for a software. 89.247.199.31 (talk) 15:27, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:08, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.