Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenDocument technical specification
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 14:33, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Borderline computercruft, WP:NOT an indiscriminate collection of info, self-reference starts article. This is actually the second article I've nominated that starts with a self-reference: the other is Politics of Wallonia, and that has since been expanded. TrackerTV (CW|Castform|Green Valley) 04:16, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep - The OpenDocument article lists some external sources, so the software is notable enough. Lists (or tables) about notable subject are also notable, in my opinion. --Daniel Olsen 07:07, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep per Daniel. Tonywalton | Talk 12:02, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - logical section split from OpenDocument - several other tags would be more constructive than AfD. Ace of Risk 14:33, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - OpenDocument is one of a class of similar standards. While this article is never going to teach anyone how to read OpenDocument on it's own, it's useful for documenting the technology and heritage of the format. AlexHudson 22:35, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep per above. --Czj 20:25, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep as per AlexHudson's comments. It is also a good launching point for those that do wish to get more technical knowledge of the spec. --User:Minion_o'_Bill
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.