- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy deletion per CSD A7. De728631 (talk) 14:24, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- OpenLearn.in (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This appears to be a false article entered for the purpose of leading to a commercial advertisement site: "References" section links to an "OpenLearn.in" web site site that leads here... http://ww2.openlearn.in/, among valid links, the "External Links" section links to to a nonexistent site "OpenLRN"... http://www.openlrn.org/ ELApro (talk) 16:47, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This is actually the second nomination for deletion of this article. Checking the History, a first nomination for speedy deletion was made 04:32, 26 May 2013 by 117.244.230.42 but was restored by SFK2 for reason: "not a valid CSD criteria." ELApro (talk) 17:09, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete per WP:CSD#A7 as an article about web content that fails to make a claim to importance or significance. It appears this is one website, or "portal", of the organization OpenLRN – Open Learning Resources Network which also might be non-notable. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 21:48, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: I have tagged the article for speedy deletion per above. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 21:52, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.