- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo (talk) 12:15, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wiki software. No independent sources, no claim of notability, not strictly an A7 speedy (product not firm). Guy (Help!) 15:44, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove this entry. While it does refer to a vendor product, I am not a vendor and I found the information very valuable. Whether the claims of perfomance are valid or not, anyone reading an uncorraborated performance claim should recognize it as a subjective opinion. If that is the true reason for removal, then simply remove the claims from the Wiki entry not the entire entry.
This was linked from the matrix that compares wiki engines. [[1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_wiki_software]Boar Hunter 14:50, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tikiwont 08:27, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete At the end of the day the only question is "Is it notable?" I don't think so. Alberon 09:07, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Alberon. Handschuh-talk to me 10:18, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or Merge to Wiki. --Brewcrewer 10:36, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete --NeutralPoint (talk) 18:15, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.