Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open Cubic Player

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:14, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Open Cubic Player (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

No references. Not notable. No claim to be notable. Miami33139 (talk) 00:15, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:21, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:54, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:54, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Unreferenced. No Google News/Books/Scholar results. No apparent WP:RS results on Google Web^[1][2]. — Rankiri (talk) 17:36, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:23, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unless reliably and independently sourced; I wasn't able to find anything either. —Korath (Talk) 14:30, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.