Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open iT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:54, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Open iT

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Open iT (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. The Computerworld article only contains a brief mention that some other company used Open iT's products, and the other two sources were authored by a company employee. Can't find anything else besides trivial mentions and another article published by a senior employee. Also this source which is apparently a vanity award publication after looking through online reviews. The generic name makes it hard to search, though. Deproded in 2006. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 01:06, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Software, and Norway. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 01:06, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Does not meet WP:NCORP an company's software WP:NSOFT. As-written the article reads like a brochure for the company's products. Most available sources don't appear to be independent of the company either.

Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 01:59, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Article lacks independent coverage from WP:RS and cursory searches at google and newspapers.com didn't reveal anything better, although the generic name doesn't help here. Let'srun (talk) 23:28, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.