- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete JERRY talk contribs 20:02, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see how this article is notable, and it's not relevant enough to merge into Opera (web browser). Deletion is probably the most appropriate option, but I'm open to suggestions. —Remember the dot (talk) 01:12, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Opera (web browser), add the pic there if desired. JJL (talk) 01:38, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge Back into Opera (web browser), adding {{fact}} where required. Fosnez (talk) 02:42, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd really rather not...it doesn't seem very relevant, and I don't want to introduce unsourced statements into a featured article. I like JJL's suggestion of just redirecting. —Remember the dot (talk) 02:55, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of OS-tans. The OS-tans (which started the whole moe anthropomorphism fad for technology) are only marginally notable; knock offs like Opera-tan and Moezilla are less so. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 03:08, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of OS-tans. -- Mikeblas (talk) 07:08, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Google search gave 3000 hits but didn't yield WP:RS. Hits for the character is usually confined in forums and blogs and most of the hits I got seems to direct to a Chinese Opera. Cute design, but Lenticel's cuteness guideline isn't WP:NOTE--Lenticel (talk) 12:24, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.