Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation AIRPLANE

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Addhoc (talk) 14:12, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Operation AIRPLANE (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Speedy deletion requested because it is "not important", which is not a valid speedy reason. I did initially delete it as lacking context, as this was the version that was speedy tagged, but realized that there is more history to this, so decided AfD was the better route, even if I think this will end up as a snowball closure. It is simply an in-universe plot reptition, no real world notability. If deleted, redirect Operation: A.I.R.P.L.A.N.E. should go too. Resolute 23:09, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The article is largely a plot-summary. No notability is asserted, and it is written from an in-universe perspective. RJC ^{Talk Contribs} 02:36, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No, it's not a speedy, but most Kids Next Door episodes are not notable, and this is O.R. at its worst. A page listing the episodes, and what the initials in each one stand for, isn't a bad idea; but episode pages should be temporary, not permanent. Someone got the experience of writing about something they know about, and maybe learned something along the way, but it's time to take it back down. Delete this one, and a few months from now, someone else will see a red link in the K.N.D. article, and say, "Nobody's ever done an article about Operation AIRPLANE" and the process will start again. Mandsford (talk) 02:46, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. More specifically, merge, without redirection, with the KND article, stripping away the “Goshthisisgreat!” stuff. There is no more notability here than sufficient for a very few sentences. —SlamDiego_←T 17:39, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.