Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation R.E.L.P Trilogy
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete. SmartSE (talk) 13:15, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Operation R.E.L.P Trilogy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about an ... Australian independent not-for-profit film ... that ... had only had two public showings. It's an amateur animated short video only released through video sharing web sites. Even the production teams website is a free space provider. A Prod has been declined giving two totally forged sources (NME link is a search link [1], and the expert Howitt, Rohan is a high school student [2]. Ben Ben (talk) 12:42, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies, I didn't realise that NME is a search link - nevermind it, then. And just a correction, Rohan Howitt is no longer a high school student - you're referencing a document from 2008. He is currently working on the National Syllabus in conjunction with the Department of Education in Australia and has been published multiple times in publications before. And regardless, he is not referred to as an expert in the article (although I would class him as one), simply as the 'Young Historian of the Year'. His quote is completely valid. Just wanted to clear that up. CriticalPictures 11:57, 1 November 2011
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Ben Ben (talk) 12:59, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note I've speedily deleted this per WP:CSD#G11 as unambiguous promotion. SmartSE (talk) 13:12, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.