Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operational Programme Italy-Malta 2007-2013

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wifione ^Message 16:38, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Operational Programme Italy-Malta 2007-2013

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yet another EU project where the author thinks that independent references are unnecessary. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:32, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

delete more WP:GNG non-notable europrojectcruft. At least pokemon character and other fancruft articles have independent sourcing! These europrojectcruft could probably belong in Wikisource, tho. --Cerejota (talk) 23:42, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 02:35, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha Quadrant ^talk 00:10, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:GNG. I could not find any coverage of this. --Odie5533 (talk) 05:53, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Here's a link from a quick Google search with the words (verbatim) "news, Operational Programme Italy-Malta" typed in Google - here, from the European Commission, which provides unbiased and comprehensive information. Here's another link from the same search from the government of Malta The Italia-Malta Programme 2007-2013. While they could possibly be considered as primary sources, they are nevertheless sources that verify the article, and the notability of the article. From the same search here is a downloadable PDF from the European Commission, the executive body of the European Union: here. These are valid sources that cover the topic, the topic is noteworthy, and the article should remain to be expanded by other users. Northamerica1000 (talk) 23:18, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Here's a comprehensive report from the Maltese government: link.Northamerica1000 (talk) 23:39, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Both are primary sources that are not independent of the subject. Please see WP:GNG.--Cerejota (talk) 00:47, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As above. Neutrality^talk 07:34, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.