Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Optimal Payments

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (cackle) @ 14:12, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Optimal Payments

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is a contested prod. The original concern, which I believe is valid, was that the coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. Mike V • Talk 23:29, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk to me 00:01, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk to me 00:01, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep -Subject appears to have received significant coverage in multiple secondary, independent and reliable sources that would help them to reach the WP:GNG and WP:NCORP standard such as, [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], (Highbeam -[14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19]), etc. There are many more. I request nominator to withdraw as their concerns have been addressed. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 13:58, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:27, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 04:29, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.