Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Optimal thinking
![]() | This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2009 May 15. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
![]() | This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2009 May 15. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 04:47, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod. The proposer's reason was "Non-notable WP:NEOLOGISM, borderline spam for non-notable book, no reliable 3rd-party references per WP:RS, can find nothing supporting notability online." I agree on all counts. It is borderline spam (not blatant enough to speedy delete, IMO), and it completely lacks independent sourcing. The closest things to sources on the page are the book (in multiple translations) and its website. —C.Fred (talk) 02:32, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]