Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orhan Awatramani (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 08:49, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orhan Awatramani

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Orhan Awatramani
• Articles for deletion/Orhan Awatramani (2nd nomination)
• Articles for deletion/Orhan Awatramani (3rd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Orhan Awatramani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ENTERTAINER. Socialite known for being friends with nepo babies, has not "made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment" Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:23, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:40, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:40, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:41, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:41, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:41, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:41, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:41, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I agree with the nomination. Zuck28 (talk) 08:29, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Non-notable individual and no indication of notability. AgerJoy talk 08:56, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I had removed the majority of the references as being unreliable but had not looked closer at notability. Previous AfD cites SCMP and BBC as significant coverage when in fact they are simply tabloid posts. A lot of references online but they are all churnalism and NEWSORGINDIA. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:29, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: As per WP:ENTERTAINER guidelines a “person has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment.” He got media attention for only being spotted with Bollywood celebs in major parties. Fails WP:ENTERTAINER TheSlumPanda (talk) 20:20, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Per nom. RangersRus (talk) 18:01, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.