Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oroborus (window manager)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 22:09, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oroborus (window manager)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Aparently non-notable window manager. Can't find any independent third-party reliable sources establishing notability. Psychonaut (talk) 15:37, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Mentioned in a bunch of lists of such software, but not much else. Pcap ping 18:06, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. and as lacking notability. --Bejnar (talk) 19:54, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow ^Talk 01:45, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This project RIP'd in 2005y, but in official site i can see a news: 2010-02-15 New releases. Maybe we must give them a chance? 3 or 4 months and warning on the page :D, as i think. iorlas (talk) 01:58, 23 February 2010 (UTC) — iorlas (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- It doesn't matter how recent the last release was. Please see Wikipedia:Notability for our criteria for inclusion. —Psychonaut (talk) 09:23, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:28, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.