Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OrthodoxWiki (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect. - Mailer Diablo 06:46, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable Wiki with no reliable sources and only 17 unique Google hits. Old AFDs can be found here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OrthodoxWiki, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OrthodoxWiki (2nd nomination). Article was kept despite previously for the sole reason that it was a wiki and keep "voters" never addressed the nominators' concerns in either case. Delete as not meeting WP:WEB and with no reliable sources. Wickethewok 13:22, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete--Peephole 13:27, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- fails some combination of WP:OR and/or WP:V WilyD 13:31, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and WiliD ST47 13:48, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete as likely repost of previously deleted stuff. --Arnzy ^{(whats up?)} 13:54, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Where? - CrazyRussian talk/email 13:56, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • My mistake, mixed up with another AFD. --Arnzy ^{(whats up?)} 14:04, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Christian wikis - CrazyRussian talk/email 13:56, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Its already listed there btw and there's really not much info to merge. Wickethewok 14:01, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Goodie. So just redirect it and call it "done". - CrazyRussian talk/email 14:35, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When it was first nominated the article on Christian wikis either wasn't mentioned or I missed it. Now that I know of it I'd go with redirect to Christian wikis as well.--T. Anthony 02:14, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect per Crazy Russian. Artw 14:48, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Anomo 14:49, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect Per CrazyRussian Viva La Vie Boheme! 21:18, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect — per CrazyRussian. Dionyseus 23:18, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I'd like to give my reasoning here: first of all, I may be new to this, but it seems to me that if the article has survived two prior attempts at deletion that it must be pretty solid.

Secondly, the number of articles the OrthodoxWiki boasts stands by itself as a strong indicator of the site's notability.

Thirdly, we are are in fact discussing a Wiki devoted to an entire religious subgrouping, which I would imagine merits at least some sort of mention. I cannot conceive of why anyone would wish to get rid of this. To those voting to delete this article, I would ask you to please thoroughly explain what led you to your decision, that I may better understand where the debate is.

SwedishConqueror 03:20, 23 August 2006 (UTC)SwedishConqueror[reply]

I voted keep when it was first nominated and considered doing so again. However it seems unlikely the article will ever be more than a stub. As such it can be dealt with in the Christian wikis article. There are several articles that work better as part of another article rather than on their own. See what Church of the Last Testament or Manjula Nahasapeemapetilon leads you to.(not great analogies I know)--T. Anthony 05:55, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• KEEP Afterall, this page leads to articles concerning the second largest Christian denomination in the world. It isn't hurting anyone being present which leads me to believe that the root of this deletion process is some sort of religious persecution. Lets cut that out and quit going after something just because you don't like it. The whole point of an encyclopedia afterall is to have information regarding EVERYTHING. rlxdgrk17:30, 23 August 2006 — Possible single purpose account: rlxdgrk (talk • contribs) has made little or no other contributions outside this topic.

• Keep per SwedishConqueror wileydee 18:22, 23 August 2006 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by rlxdgrk (talk • contribs) .

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.