Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Out-of-Sync

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. Given the nominator's withdrawal and the only "vote" being to Keep the article. Liz Read! Talk! 05:14, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Out-of-Sync (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NFO and WP:NFSOURCES. I found no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes and nothing on Newspapers.com. I did a WP:BEFORE and found only one review from TV Guide. Needs two or more reviews to be eligible per NFO, NFSOURCES and WP:NEXIST. The Film Creator (talk) 11:12, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.