Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outsharing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 06:21, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Outsharing

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Largely unsourced article about a non-notable neologism. power~enwiki (π, ν) 05:01, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 06:51, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Newly fashioned subject hasn't even made it yet into the discos. -The Gnome (talk) 07:21, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, Gnome, and WP:NEO. I found another mention of it in Forbes (added), but both articles struggle to differentiate it from outsourcing. Apart from the two WP:RS cited, there's nothing worth merging. The Mighty Glen (talk) 17:40, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.