Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outsourced car pool service
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. snowy spam. StarM 02:18, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Outsourced car pool service (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Neologism in fact being guerrilla spam for an Australian company. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 08:38, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as spam. McWomble (talk) 09:10, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I prodded this article with the reason "Reads like an essay, looks to be filled with original research." At that point I didn't notice the spam, but thats another reason it should be chopped. Themfromspace (talk) 09:18, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - unsourced essay. Tohd8BohaithuGh1 (talk) 09:22, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as Spam, sausage, Spam, Spam, bacon, Spam, tomato and Spam and as an OR How-To essay. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 14:08, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Complete spam, OR, essay DavidWS (contribs) 16:39, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete (G11) — per Doc Strange, but he forgot the baked beans with the spam! MuZemike (talk) 17:55, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.