Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outsourced product development

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete consensus is that the term is not notable. Davewild (talk) 11:15, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Outsourced product development (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Seems a non-notable (at least does not assert) neologism, non-encyclopedic tone, unrefd, OR, spam etc. SGGH ^speak! 11:12, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Doesn't say anything significant that isn't covered by outsourcing. Reads like a pamphlet, states the obvious and is full of verbose business babble. Cambrasaconfab 11:17, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Fails WP:CORP Ketsuekigata (talk) 06:30, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.