Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Overjoyed Productions
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Renata 06:24, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Minor (VERY minor) "film production company based in Wayne, Michigan". Student films, shorts entered in local and minor film fests. Prod tag added, but removed without comment, followed by some grasping-at-straws edits intended to pump up notability. Calton | Talk 04:18, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It has some notability. Sharkface217 04:48, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Testimony of editors is not a reliable source. Please provide some evidence of this notability, so that it can be examined and confirmed or repudiated. - 152.91.9.144 05:17, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per norm. Unless anybody can convince me that the cited newspaper articles and/or festivals are fake. Sander123 10:18, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - verifiability problems with 29 ghits. MER-C 10:29, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per nom and MER-C.--Esprit15d (talk ¤ contribs) 18:48, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete highly non-notable, definite verifiability issues, probable vanity and conflict of interest problems. Xtifr tälk 20:22, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Nom FirefoxMan 00:57, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.