- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete g1 nonsense, WP:NFT, WP:SNOW. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:30, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Owwtee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:MADEUP and WP:NOTDICTIONARY. Was PRODed, but author declined. Favonian (talk) 08:38, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - as A7/borderline A3. ƒ(Δ)² 08:43, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete although I can't find a speedy category it fits into this clearly fails WP:NEO and WP:ONEDAY. Thryduulf (talk) 11:27, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 11:27, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete clearly an unused neologism/dictionary entry, no point sending it to Wiktionary because nobody actually uses it. Might be a rendering of OWTTE. Hut 8.5 12:39, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.