Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ozone layer formation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted by request of only major contributor. If anyone needs the article or its history, please open a request at Deletion review. - 2/0 (cont.) 15:40, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ozone layer formation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am the article/page creator of "Ozone layer formation". I request for deletion for this page as I feel the points in 'Discussion' section of this article/page holds to some extent. The theory described in the article is solely based on one article and is untested out of the lab which makes it unreliable. I am a frequent Wikipedia user and do not wish to contaminate it, if I realise it does not stand upto the standards of Wikipedia. Thank you. Jimcham17 (talk) 11:24, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. —Vsmith (talk) 12:44, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to Ozone layer? If the info is good it is worth including there. Steve Dufour (talk) 13:29, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Ozone layer. Agree with Steve Dufor. The information here would seem to make sense in the ozone layer article to complement the section on ozone layer depletion. I Jethrobot (talk) 14:05, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.