Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAN(Remote Viewing)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 07:02, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Self-promotion. The Aaron Donahue article has already been deleted. User:Zoe|^(talk) 03:05, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per Zoe. Kevin 03:33, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Nonsense promotion.--Fuhghettaboutit 03:44, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Nonsense. DVD+ R/W 03:46, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This daughter article to a deleted parent appears to be non-notable and hard to prove.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  04:32, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete randomcrapcruft M1ss1ontomars2k4 04:36, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - unverifiable. - Richardcavell 09:34, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. DarthVader 09:34, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as above. ProhibitOnions 12:32, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as advert and just a load of crap in general. Beno1000 14:37, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom.  RasputinAXP  c 14:04, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete alleged technique developed by now-deleted psychic. Part of a walled garden. Just zis Guy you know? 21:31, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.