- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was delete. Mailer Diablo 04:13, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Consists of nothing more than a badly formed and non-wikified list of administrators on PC Gamer's forum. I don't see how this is encyclopedic or notable. Dvandersluis 17:40, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete:Not worthy of a separate article. If you must, mention them in the PCGamer article, but there really isn't much to say other than they exist. --Hetar 17:42, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- No, don't. We shouldn't be listing a bunch of screen names of non-notable administrators of web forums. Plus, you know how hard that would be to keep up to date? --Cyde↔Weys 18:14, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, Cyde, I wasn't referring to mentioning the administrators and other minutia, just to a simple phrase saying that their website has forums. --Hetar 19:00, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- No, don't. We shouldn't be listing a bunch of screen names of non-notable administrators of web forums. Plus, you know how hard that would be to keep up to date? --Cyde↔Weys 18:14, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: non-significant forum, failing WP:WEB --LeflymanTalk 17:47, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, this is just another one of those articles on non-notable web forums. --Cyde↔Weys 18:14, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom -- Alias Flood 18:39, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to PC Gamer.--Andeh 19:13, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with PC Gamer article huntersquid 20:02, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No need to keep. Bibliomaniac15 20:46, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete really just a list of users. Typically poor and unenyclopedic forum article. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 21:27, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, redirect to PC Gamer; I can't see the point. It would be fine if it were an article about the Community, the nature of discussions, etc (like Slashdot), but a list of users? CaptainVindaloo t c e 02:18, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Poorly formatted, poorly written. delete — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.143.77.0 (talk • contribs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.