Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PC Tech Magazine
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 17:42, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- PC Tech Magazine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable online "magazine" lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to be more of a blog than a "magazine". Fails WP:WEB and WP:NOTBOOK. ttonyb (talk) 15:54, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:19, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A non notable website. Mattg82 (talk) 03:16, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It's not just a blog (they do sell physical magazines [1]) but it still fails WP:ORG. Feezo (Talk) 13:26, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable, unable to find references. WP:CORP. Chzz ► 05:57, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Qworty (talk) 19:32, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.