Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PCoIP (3rd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE The Bushranger One ping only 18:38, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- PCoIP (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable software product from non-notable company. Article has been to AfD twice before and both times was redirected to Desktop virtualization. This new version has only two sources, one a blog and one the company website. No evidence of notability. (Couldn't PROD this as has already been PRODded in the past). PamD 16:20, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 21:07, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 02:32, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom --Nouniquenames (talk) 05:41, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Google search gives sufficient hits. It's being used in the networking field. AshLey Msg 13:44, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- This argument would require that you actually list the relevant reliable sources you found. (WP:GHITS precludes the number of hits as an argument.) --Nouniquenames (talk) 05:20, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.