Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PDCurses

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Curses (programming library)#pcurses and PDCurses. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:43, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

PDCurses

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

PDCurses (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not seem notable enough for its own article, BEFORE searches turned up only primary sources, such as the official PDCurses website and their Github. Could not find any secondary reliable sources ApexParagon (talk) 16:55, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:27, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete or merge into Curses (programming library). Looking through Google I can find some third-party references to PDcurses, but only on Reddit threads and a handful of blog posts. Does seem like notability could be established if we were able to find any remotely reliable source, but very unlikely to be worth a full article. guninvalid (talk) 18:43, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge-to Curses (programming library), Ī would agree with both Nom and what ApexParagon (talk) pointed out, as it is my search also finds it lacking in SIGCOV sources other than usual programming sites and Reddit threads.Lorraine Crane (talk) 16:49, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to curses (programming library) § pcurses and PDCurses. Currently unsourced, not much to merge, but there's a relevant section there. Alpha3031 (t • c) 05:12, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.