- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:16, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
- PDL Finance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Smallish and apparently unremarkable loan shark pay day loan company. Their legal name has basically zero coverage, and their DBA has... some passing mention, and apparently there are a lot of males with the last name "Lender". But nothing I'm seeing that amounts to sustained in-depth coverage, and nothing to suggest they are not just one of many probably tens of thousands of regional extortionists pay day loan companies that have garnered media attention only because of their racket ... theft ... because of the controversial nature of their industry. TimothyJosephWood 12:34, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator; no in depth coverage. I still feel it merits speedy deletion(though I understand opening this discussion and do not fault the nominator in any way) 331dot (talk) 12:35, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:59, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:59, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Fails GNG/CORPDEPTH, the refs seem to be about the industry as a whole, not this particular business. South Nashua (talk) 13:01, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as above. Bungle (talk • contribs) 16:49, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Lacks corporate Depth coverage on media. What it says on matters does not establish the purpose of notability. Light2021 (talk) 04:15, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per the above, fails GNG/CORPDEPTH. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 04:41, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.