Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PHANTOM FEATURES

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Deleted, as per WP:SNOWBALL. The Anome 00:27, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nonnotable independent film/production company, not on IMDB, see above entry for Evil owen. NawlinWiki 15:23, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Delete Sniff, sniff. I smell spam. Dipics 15:24, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete See Evil owen, also currently in AfD, and with near-identical content (I haven't checked to see whether it's exactly the same, although that seems probable). --ais523 15:25, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Basically the same content as Evil owen, also in AFD. Film company that doesn't seem to exist, unknown to IMDB and Google, apparently run by unknown director to create unknown film. Fan-1967 15:27, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, advertising of apparently nn production company. -- The Anome 15:42, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as ad/vanity.--M@rēino 16:20, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delte per nom as an advertisement and vanity. --Bigtop 17:43, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• He also cloned the article at Phantom Features. I've added it here. Fan-1967 19:31, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Per most of above logic and per crystal ballism since it isn't even out yet and there is no compelling evidence it will come out. JoshuaZ 20:10, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.