- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 13:21, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Church with questionable notability. The article does not assert any notability, and Googling for it yields only 300 hits (and no news articles). — HelloAnnyong [ t · c ] 07:39, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Doesn't seem to be notable at all, reads like an ad. -- Dougie WII (talk) 08:25, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non notable unless some sources beyond the two blogs that mention the organisation. Nuttah (talk) 09:51, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete per Dougie WII. STORMTRACKER 94 12:54, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - COI problems and lack of sources. Addhoc (talk) 13:16, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy No notability is asserted. If it is notable, it should have been at least declared in the short article. Pharmboy (talk) 15:58, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as above. (jarbarf) (talk) 05:34, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable at all, no sources are given. It's only a promotional article. Dekisugi (talk) 13:03, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.