- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete as per all valid votes.--May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 16:37, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Not notable as provided for in Wikipedia:Notability and Music Guidelines Naturenet | Talk 12:34, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable, WP:MUSIC. Get a contract with a label, get a few albums out, and then come back. --StuffOfInterest 14:42, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete vanity --Bluezy 12:37, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Not delete a thrilling tale of a young band's willingness, against all odds, to strive towards success, despite the thoughts of many doubters ^^^ MasterOfPuppets 21:17, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Above comment actually by User:81.97.124.31 - Naturenet | Talk 22:55, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Not Delete Notable according to to guidline 13 of music and ensembles guidelines Wikipedia:Notability and Music Guidelines Gomez 12:02 5 December 2005 (UTC)
- Above comment actually by User:81.97.124.31. Guideline 13 briefly (until reverted) read, "Is called Pictar". --OpenToppedBus - Talk to the driver 12:26, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Oooo, my aching sides ;) Naturenet | Talk 16:40, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non-notable vanity Stephenb (Talk) 14:13, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.