Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PIESS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. нмŵוτнτ 19:43, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PIESS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Wikipedia is not a dictionary. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:00, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete - No context to assert notability of the subject. It just appears to be a school program. Either way, it does not assert any notability. Undeath (talk) 03:35, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I actually declined a G11 on it, and immediately took it to AFD. I couldn't quite justify a G11, but the thought did cross my mind. SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:42, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • G11 might not have been the best way to speedy it either. The no context delete, IMO, fits great. Undeath (talk) 04:11, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete- non-notable, as only Google hit is the page itself. Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 03:45, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nothing to show that it has notability, it also lacks context. Oysterguitarist 05:05, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete as spam, per my original tag on the article since removed (see also comments above). I believe it does qualify for speedy deletion on this basis because the references all take you to class sign-up pages. I also endorse nomination. Ros0709 (talk) 08:45, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.